On namespaces - please do NOT use *.bukkit in your plugins.

What about plugins that already use it? DO we have an expected transition date?

What about verification for ownership of namespaces, etc?

You should have an expected transition date of nearly a decade ago, since what EvilSeph just said is a polite reiteration of what's been a published java standard since very nearly the beginning of the language itself.

How would you do .co.uk ? uk.co.alexgeek.plugin?
backwards time!

Thank you, Mr. Snert.

I'm asking about a technical requirment, not a social one. Social requirements don't matter and cant limit what can be programed, technological ones can. One of the issues I was thinking about in regards to Fill and the rest to where the plugin stuff is going - as I feel I know more then I probably should - is that currently we have a problem with the fact that they have blindsided us and FORCED us to register commands we want to use in yaml that is hard coded within the plugin, that can not be edited in any way; and this creates HUGE problems as it greatty limits what people can do, and offers NO SOLUTION for people who want to either have a dynamicly configured command used in their plugin, or want to support allowing people to use the command from one plugin with another (multiple plugins supporting the /time command, for example). It also creates a SECURITY problem as commands can be high-jacked so forth as no namespace verification or plugin verification is being done.

Exactly.

i will update my plugins when i release an update to them

the other option is to forgo the domain and just use the user name, i publish them with mindless728.plugin

Might want to update the tutorial wiki, it specifically states to use "com.bukkit.<yourname>.<yourpluginname>" in step 3.3. I actually paused there and considered if this was a requirement of Bukkit or not and chose use my standard naming convention instead. Guess I made the right choice.

http://wiki.bukkit.org/Programming_A_Plugin

Quoting for win. Glad I could help.

yeah!

that's the reason i am/was using it
--- merged: Feb 8, 2011 11:36 PM ---

wait, you mean 15/02/2011 ? 08 would be in half a year

Yeah, thanks to the wiki I thought this was a requirement so I was really confused about what this change could possibly mean. This is a bit confusing for people who normally don't use languages like java.

+1 this. I had no idea as well, previously being a C++ guy.

So I am pretty new at programming. I am currently using the package com.bukkit.ursaarcadius.FindItem because that is how I was shown to do it. What should I change this to? And will changing this break anything?

seems ursaarcadius.finditem or com.ursaarcadius.finditem is perfectly fine.... now for me to go fix my plugins....

Personally I would use nick.plugin if you are not associated with any organization and do not have your own website. I would leave TLD's for those of you who actually have a domain on a TLD. That is just my opinion though and won't affect the validity of any plugin submission.

If you don't have a domain, just use your reverse email address, so if that is: megaawesome@hotmale.cum use cum.hotmale.megaawesome.<pluginname> .

Why is it reverse?

Because of the structure of a package/domain? For example “en.wikipedia.org.” means: Search for the DNS server for org. If he founds it, it asks this server for wikipedia and so on. In the packages it's like this: You selecting a subpool of a bigger pool and search then in this pool.

For example the class “java.util.List”. At first in “java” are all general classes. In there you only select the utility classes and there only the List “class” (actually it's a interface).

Fabian

I'm using "com.matejdro.bukkit.jail" due to Plugin development guide that was posted here some time ago.

Would simply "com.matejdro.jail" be fine?

Or wait, should i use "com.gmail.matejdro.jail"????

This is confusing. What do gmail have to do with bukkit?

Why is “com.matejdro.bukkit.” not allowed? It is in matejdro namespace and therefore his decision? lukegb previously said, that “(com|org|net).bukkit” is not allowed any more. There is bukkit on the 2nd level. In matejdro case bukkit is on the 3rd level?

Fabian

Thanks for the clarification.

Fabian

Should probably sticky this.

I've been using com.eighty8.bukkit.pluginname, so I should be fine.
EDIT: What the guy above me said.

Umm, since eighty8.com does not even exist, you are not fine:

But this is just a recommendation, so you are fine anyway